XML Feed for RxPG News   Add RxPG News Headlines to My Yahoo!   Javascript Syndication for RxPG News

Research Health World General
 
  Home
 
 Latest Research
 Cancer
 Psychiatry
 Genetics
 Surgery
 Aging
 Ophthalmology
 Gynaecology
 Neurosciences
 Pharmacology
 Cardiology
 Obstetrics
 Infectious Diseases
 Respiratory Medicine
 Pathology
 Endocrinology
 Immunology
 Nephrology
 Gastroenterology
 Biotechnology
 Radiology
 Dermatology
 Microbiology
 Haematology
 Dental
 ENT
 Environment
 Embryology
 Orthopedics
 Metabolism
 Anaethesia
 Paediatrics
 Public Health
 Urology
 Musculoskeletal
 Clinical Trials
 Physiology
 Biochemistry
 Cytology
 Traumatology
 Rheumatology
 
 Medical News
 Health
 Opinion
 Healthcare
  UK
   NHS
  USA
  World
  India
  South Africa
  New Zealand
  Australia
  Canada Healthcare
  China Healthcare
  Africa
 Professionals
 Launch
 Awards & Prizes
 
 Careers
 Medical
 Nursing
 Dental
 
 Special Topics
 Euthanasia
 Ethics
 Evolution
 Odd Medical News
 Feature
 
 World News
 Tsunami
 Epidemics
 Climate
 Business
Search

Last Updated: Aug 19th, 2006 - 22:18:38

NHS Channel
subscribe to NHS newsletter

Medical News : Healthcare : UK : NHS

   DISCUSS   |   EMAIL   |   PRINT
Is it time to give NHS more independence?
Jul 30, 2006, 02:49, Reviewed by: Dr. Priya Saxena

“We may now, indeed be ruled by fundamentalists whose faith in markets, competition, and the profit motive as the sole path to effective public service is unshakeable. Paradoxically, an NHS agency could spearhead the crusade.”

 
In April this year, BMJ Editor Fiona Godlee called for an independent NHS run by a board of governors responsible for managing health care within a set budget and a broad political framework.

In this week’s BMJ, four opinion leaders give their views on whether it is time to give the NHS greater independence from government.

“Democratic control is essential,” argues Stephen Thornton, Chief Executive of The Health Foundation. “Democratic checks and balances are the best way to ensure we continue to move the NHS in the right direction, not the creation of a barely accountable technocracy that would place all power in the hands of professionals and bureaucrats."

The key issue is how to do this more effectively than at present. He believes the trick is to deal with the democratic deficit in policy making and commissioning while giving much more operational freedom to healthcare providers.

A second article, by Gwyn Bevan, Professor of Management Science at the London School of Economics, argues that the destabilisation of the NHS in England through successive reorganisations has meant that the only options for governance have been either a competitive provider market or a regime of targets.

Each has serious limitations, he says, and the movement from one to the other has contributed to the squandering of unprecedented increases in NHS funding. His call for 'independence' for the NHS is to design systems of local accountability that would offer an effective alternative to provider competition or a centrally-driven regime of targets.

General gractitioner Stephen Gillam warns that "an independent NHS will become a glorified commissioning agency as what used to be a national health service becomes an amalgam of free floating foundation hospitals, NHS trusts, private companies, and traditional primary care providers."

“We may now, indeed be ruled by fundamentalists whose faith in markets, competition, and the profit motive as the sole path to effective public service is unshakeable,” he writes. “Paradoxically, an NHS agency could spearhead the crusade.”

In the final article, two US health experts believe that the NHS has the inherent capability to become the greatest healthcare system of any nation.

They applaud Labour’s original plan for “modernisation” and advise not to remove NHS leadership too far from government power. But they wonder whether something big should change to steady the NHS on its worthy, inspiring journey.

“The NHS is not just a national treasure; it is a global treasure,” they write. “As unabashed fans, we urge a dialogue on possible forms of stabilisation to better provide the NHS with the time, space, and constancy of purpose to realise its enormous promise.”
 

- British Medical Journal, 29 July 2006 (Vol 333, No 7561)
 

Read the full article at bmj.com

 
Subscribe to NHS Newsletter
E-mail Address:

 

“The NHS is not just a national treasure; it is a global treasure”

Related NHS News

Mental health units should not be exempt from smoking ban
NHS may be buying surgical equipment unethically
Is it time to give NHS more independence?
Experts Comment on New Blood Pressure Guidelines
New Guideance will Result in Better Control of Hypertension - BPA
NHS care for older people is still patchy
NHS could save £78m by improving staff productivity
Have targets improved performance in the English NHS?
Denying Joint Replacements Based On Prejudice
NHS needs to do more to provide need based health care


For any corrections of factual information, to contact the editors or to send any medical news or health news press releases, use feedback form

Top of Page

 

© Copyright 2004 onwards by RxPG Medical Solutions Private Limited
Contact Us