XML Feed for RxPG News   Add RxPG News Headlines to My Yahoo!   Javascript Syndication for RxPG News

Research Health World General
 
  Home
 
 Latest Research
 Cancer
 Psychiatry
 Genetics
 Surgery
 Aging
 Ophthalmology
 Gynaecology
 Neurosciences
 Pharmacology
 Cardiology
 Obstetrics
 Infectious Diseases
 Respiratory Medicine
 Pathology
 Endocrinology
 Immunology
 Nephrology
 Gastroenterology
 Biotechnology
 Radiology
 Dermatology
 Microbiology
 Haematology
 Dental
 ENT
 Environment
 Embryology
 Orthopedics
 Metabolism
 Anaethesia
 Paediatrics
 Public Health
 Urology
 Musculoskeletal
 Clinical Trials
 Physiology
 Biochemistry
 Cytology
 Traumatology
 Rheumatology
 
 Medical News
 Health
 Opinion
 Healthcare
 Professionals
  Doctors
   UK
   GMC
   GP
  Nurses
 Launch
 Awards & Prizes
 
 Careers
 Medical
 Nursing
 Dental
 
 Special Topics
 Euthanasia
 Ethics
 Evolution
 Odd Medical News
 Feature
 
 World News
 Tsunami
 Epidemics
 Climate
 Business
Search

Last Updated: Nov 17th, 2006 - 22:35:04

GMC Channel
subscribe to GMC newsletter

Medical News : Professionals : Doctors : GMC

   DISCUSS   |   EMAIL   |   PRINT
GMC needs to get its head out of the sand over revalidation
May 13, 2005, 18:06, Reviewed by: Dr.

"As a practising doctor I would like to be able to show my patients that I am practising at a standard which is safe and up to date. I do not fear revalidation and, like the majority of doctors, would welcome it."

 
The General Medical Council needs to get its head out of the sand over revalidation, argues a senior doctor in this week's BMJ.

In June 2000, the GMC set out its initial plans for revalidation to "protect patients from poorly performing doctors who would be identified as early as possible." This was enshrined in law in December 2002.

But by April 2003, the GMC revised its plans, basing revalidation on doctors' annual appraisals, even though appraisals were not set up to judge a doctor's competence. In 2004, the Shipman inquiry forced the GMC to shelve its plans, and a high level review is now being conducted by the chief medical office for England.

The GMC's revised plans for revalidation will not detect poorly performing doctors, writes Professor Aneez Esmail, medical adviser to the Shipman inquiry. Revalidation is supposed to weed out doctors that are not fit to practise, yet appraisal has probably not identified a single doctor whose performance is seriously deficient, despite being in operation for nearly three years.

The public has also been told that revalidation is rather like an MOT test for doctors, yet there are no clear standards by which a doctor's fitness to practise can be determined, no objective test, and no independent scrutiny of that test.

He believes that revalidation has immense value for individual doctors. "As a practising doctor I would like to be able to show my patients that I am practising at a standard which is safe and up to date," he says. "I do not fear revalidation and, like the majority of doctors, would welcome it."

Revalidation is not about catching another Shipman or about judges dictating to doctors how they should regulate themselves. It is about safeguarding patients ? nothing more and nothing less, he concludes.
 

- Read the full text at bmj.com
 

bmj.com

 
Subscribe to GMC Newsletter
E-mail Address:

 

Contact:
Aneez Esmail, Professor of General Practice, Division of Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, UK Email:


Related GMC News

Doctor warned for refusing treatment
GMC Plans New Rules on Doctorsí Licences
Patients Have Confidence in Doctors Who Communicate Well
GMC needs to get its head out of the sand over revalidation
GMC is updating good medical practice
GMC agrees with need of Mental Capacity Bill
GMC office to be opened in Cardiff
The case of Charlotte Wyatt
GMC to appeal judgement
GMC committee on Principles of Good Medical Education and Training


For any corrections of factual information, to contact the editors or to send any medical news or health news press releases, use feedback form

Top of Page

 

© Copyright 2004 onwards by RxPG Medical Solutions Private Limited
Contact Us