New Report on Smoke-Free Public Places
Apr 28, 2005 - 5:53:00 PM
|
|
|
The time has come to clear the air. Here is the information to counter the arguments made by those who oppose a comprehensive ban on smoking in enclosed public places and workplaces."
|
By BMA Scotland,
[RxPG] The BMA in Scotland has today (Thursday 28 April 2005) published a report that will clear the air on the smoking debate. The report, Behind the smokescreen, brings together evidence that supports the arguments in favour of the introduction of legislation to end smoking in enclosed public places in Scotland.
Behind the smokescreen identifies key arguments raised by opponents to legislation and presents the facts to challenge the myths generated in attempts to undermine the evidence in support of a ban. The publication considers four key arguments: choice; public opinion and enforcement; health and science; and economics.
The Scottish Licensed Trade Association has argued that legislation will simply shift smoking from public places to the home1. However, there is no evidence to support claims that the smoke-free law in Ireland has resulted in greater exposure to second-hand smoke in the home. In fact, international evidence suggests that smoke-free laws result in less exposure in the home2.
The Tobacco Industry continues to argue that there is no risk to health from exposure to second hand smoke3. However, an independent review of all available evidence on second hand smoke and cancer concluded exposure to other peoples smoke increases the risk of lung cancer in non smokers by 20-30 per cent4.
Dr Peter Terry, chairman of the BMA in Scotland, said:
I am proud that in Scotland we are leading the rest of the UK in the smoking debate. This is a tribute to devolution.
The myths highlighted in this document are well rehearsed in Scotland, but that doesnt make them true. There is no choice for non-smokers who have to socialise and work in smoke-filled rooms. Piecemeal measures to restrict smoking in public places will fail to protect the health of the people of Scotland. Economic arguments flounder in the face of international experience, and scientific evidence clearly links exposure to passive smoke with potentially disabling illness such as asthma and potentially fatal illness such as lung cancer and coronary heart disease.
The time has come to clear the air. Here is the information to counter the arguments made by those who oppose a comprehensive ban on smoking in enclosed public places and workplaces.
The evidence is clear, smoke-free public places save lives.
The publication of this report comes as the Scottish Parliament prepares to debate the Smoking, Health and Social Care (Scotland) Bill later today.
Advertise in this space for $10 per month.
Contact us today.
|
 |
|
Subscribe to UK Newsletter
|
|
|
|
Additional information about the news article
|
References:
1. The Scottish Licensed Trade Associations submission to the Scottish Parliaments Health and Community Care Committee consultation on the Smoking, Health and Social Care (Scotland) Bill, February 2005. This claims that a ban on smoking in hospitality outlets will lead to an increase in smoking in the home: http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/committees/health/reports-05/her05-06-vol02-05.htm#1
2. International evidence suggests that smoke-free laws result in less exposure in the home, because:
* Smoke-free laws encourage smokers to quit. When fewer adults smoke, childrens exposure to second-hand smoke is reduced.
* In Australia, the proportion of family homes with smoking restrictions more than doubled (25% - 59%) after smoke-free workplaces were introduced. In households where one adult smoked, the proportion with smoking restrictions rose from 17 per cent to 53 per cent; among those where all adults smoked, it increased from 2% to 32%.
* In California, the proportion of children and adolescents living in smoke free homes increased from 38% in 1992, to 82.2% in 1999, one year after all enclosed public places and workplaces became smoke-free state-wide.
* Data from Australia shows that current and former smokers who work in smoke-free environments are more likely to have smoke-free homes.
3. The Tobacco Manufacturing Associations (TMA) submission to the Scottish Parliaments Health and Community Care Committee consultation on the Smoking, Health and Social Care (Scotland) Bill, February 2005 in which the TMA states the evidence for environmental tobacco smoke being a cause of disease is inconclusive: http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/committees/health/reports-05/her05-06-vol02-05.htm#2
4. International Agency for Research on Cancer declares second-hand smoke carcinogenic to humans. Press Release, 28 May 2005. Available online: http://www.iarc.fr/ENG/Press_Releases/pr152a.html
|
|
Feedback
|
For any corrections of factual information, to contact the editors or to send
any medical news or health news press releases, use
feedback form
|
Top of Page
|
