RxPG News Feed for RxPG News

Medical Research Health Special Topics World
  Home
 
   Health
 Aging
 Asian Health
 Events
 Fitness
 Food & Nutrition
 Happiness
 Men's Health
 Mental Health
 Occupational Health
 Parenting
 Public Health
 Sleep Hygiene
 Women's Health
 
   Healthcare
 Africa
 Australia
 Canada Healthcare
 China Healthcare
 India Healthcare
 New Zealand
 South Africa
 UK
 USA
 World Healthcare
 
 Latest Research
 Aging
 Alternative Medicine
 Anaethesia
 Biochemistry
 Biotechnology
 Cancer
 Cardiology
 Clinical Trials
 Cytology
 Dental
 Dermatology
 Embryology
 Endocrinology
 ENT
 Environment
 Epidemiology
 Gastroenterology
 Genetics
 Gynaecology
 Haematology
 Immunology
 Infectious Diseases
 Medicine
 Metabolism
 Microbiology
 Musculoskeletal
 Nephrology
 Neurosciences
 Obstetrics
 Ophthalmology
 Orthopedics
 Paediatrics
 Pathology
 Pharmacology
 Physiology
 Physiotherapy
 Psychiatry
 Radiology
 Rheumatology
 Sports Medicine
 Surgery
 Toxicology
 Urology
 
   Medical News
 Awards & Prizes
 Epidemics
 Launch
 Opinion
 Professionals
 
   Special Topics
 Ethics
 Euthanasia
 Evolution
 Feature
 Odd Medical News
 Climate

Last Updated: Oct 11, 2012 - 10:22:56 PM
Research Article
Latest Research Channel

subscribe to Latest Research newsletter
Latest Research

   EMAIL   |   PRINT
UC's Fry informs fantasy football fans

Aug 23, 2007 - 4:00:00 AM
OK, so Fry knows the numbers. How’s his game when it comes to fantasy play He’s won his league once and made the playoffs seven times in nine years of playing. And his competition is no small peanuts.

 
[RxPG] It's fantasy football season! And just in time for the frenzy, Assistant Professor Michael Fry and student Andrew Lundberg have published their results. It amounts to this: you have a set of choices that people can make. All you really want to know — in fantasy and in real drafts — is what set of players is not going to be available when your turn comes up.

UC’s Fry Informs Fantasy Football Fans Fantasy football gains a mathematical foundation, thanks to a researcher in UC’s College of Business.

It's fantasy football season! And just in time for the frenzy, Assistant Professor of Operations Management Michael Fry and MSQA student Andrew Lundberg published their results in the Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports. “A Player Selection Heuristic for a Sports League Draft” was based on work conducted at the University of Cincinnati, along with co-author Jeffrey Ohlmann from the University of Iowa.

Sports leagues conduct new player entry drafts in which franchises select, in a pre-determined order, players to complement their existing rosters. We model the decision-making process of a single sports franchise during a player selection draft. The basic premise of our model is that a team selects a particular player based on a combination of the player's estimated value, the value of the other players currently available, and the team's need at each position. — from “A Player Selection Heuristic for a Sports League Draft”

Mike Fry says his numbers stack up.

“Our results are robust,” says Fry. “It amounts to this: you have a set of choices that people can make. They all want the best player available and sometimes people just go for that player, regardless of what they really need. All you really want to know — in fantasy and in real drafts — is what set of players is not going to be available when your turn comes up.”

Football presents a good opportunity for such research because — unlike basketball, for example — players generally have set positions such as running back, quarterback or defensive lineman. Basketball players, on the other hand, often play multiple positions, which makes it harder to identify exact team needs going into a draft. Baseball presents its own set of challenges because there is huge uncertainty about how a drafted player will affect an actual team that season. Baseball players often spend many years in the minors and it is very difficult to tell how a player drafted now will affect your team in the future.

“Hence, baseball drafts are about 50 rounds long while NFL is 7 and basketball is 2,” says Fry. “Although baseball would be interesting because it is more statistically tracked.”

Some of CoB's numbers crew.

Mike Fry is a fantasy football fan’s best friend. In one conversation, he can talk “heuristic,” “tractable deterministic dynamic program” and “sequential decision-making” — then tosses out “league-wide passing stats” and “detailed injury reports.” Fry is one of “Cincinnati’s Numbers Crew” in the Department of Quantitative Analysis and Operations Management, featured in UC Research magazine (Summer 2007).

Fry’s team approached the idea in two phases. He’s a fantasy leaguer himself, so he understands the routine.

“First we decide who the good players are, the same way players are evaluated in real life by scouts,” Fry says. “Then, like sports teams’ general managers, we sit down and have a draft. We pick the player you want, and you look at who you need. You might want a cornerback, but you also need a linebacker.”

Fry says that every decision affects other actions down the road, so it is not humanly possible to anticipate all the ramifications and keep track of these decisions.

His advice for fantasy fans

Using commonly available fantasy football player evaluations for the 2007 season we have noticed a few trends from our model’s output:

A traditional maxim in fantasy football is to draft two running backs in the first two rounds because RBs are seen as being the most valuable. However, this year our model generally recommends against this strategy. There are only a few (really two) sure-fire RBs and then a deep crop of 2nd-tier RBs. Thus, our model often recommends taking a RB first, then taking a top QB or WR next and coming back for your 2nd RB later. It can often be a good decision to draft one of the top defenses (generally the Chicago Bears or Baltimore Ravens) earlier than most people would suggest. If you miss out on these top defenses, then you might as well wait until the very end of the draft as there is too much uncertainty in how other defenses will perform. The same is often true for kickers. But the main point is that if you feed garbage into the model, you get garbage out. If you are convinced, for whatever misguided reason, that the Cleveland Browns QB (whoever that turns out to be) is going to be a star and you rank him first, then guess what, the model is going to tell you to draft him very high. That’s not the model’s fault, Fry points out, that’s user error.

But this is all fantasy — pretend. What difference does it make, I mean, really

“The fantasy market alone is a billion-dollar industry,” says Fry, “especially with the Internet.”

OK, so Fry knows the numbers. How’s his game when it comes to fantasy play He’s won his league once and made the playoffs seven times in nine years of playing. And his competition is no small peanuts.

“We have eight PhDs in our group,” he says, laughing. “And one NASA rocket scientist.”




Publication: Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports

Advertise in this space for $10 per month. Contact us today.


Related Latest Research News


Subscribe to Latest Research Newsletter

Enter your email address:


 Feedback
For any corrections of factual information, to contact the editors or to send any medical news or health news press releases, use feedback form

Top of Page

 
Contact us

RxPG Online

Nerve

 

    Full Text RSS

© All rights reserved by RxPG Medical Solutions Private Limited (India)