Home
 
   Health
 Aging
 Asian Health
 Events
 Fitness
 Food & Nutrition
 Happiness
 Men's Health
 Mental Health
 Occupational Health
 Parenting
 Public Health
 Sleep Hygiene
 Women's Health
 
   Healthcare
 Africa
 Australia
 Canada Healthcare
 China Healthcare
 India Healthcare
 New Zealand
 South Africa
 UK
 USA
 World Healthcare
 
   Latest Research
 Aging
 Alternative Medicine
 Anaethesia
 Biochemistry
 Biotechnology
 Cancer
 Cardiology
 Clinical Trials
 Cytology
 Dental
 Dermatology
 Embryology
 Endocrinology
 ENT
 Environment
 Epidemiology
 Gastroenterology
 Genetics
 Gynaecology
 Haematology
 Immunology
 Infectious Diseases
 Medicine
 Metabolism
 Microbiology
 Musculoskeletal
 Nephrology
 Neurosciences
 Obstetrics
 Ophthalmology
 Orthopedics
 Paediatrics
 Pathology
 Pharmacology
 Physiology
 Physiotherapy
 Psychiatry
 Radiology
 Rheumatology
 Sports Medicine
 Surgery
 Toxicology
 Urology
 
 Medical News
 Awards & Prizes
 Epidemics
 Launch
 Opinion
 Professionals
 
   Special Topics
 Ethics
 Euthanasia
 Evolution
 Feature
 Odd Medical News
 Climate

Last Updated: Sep 15, 2017 - 4:49:58 AM
News Report
Medical News Channel

subscribe to Medical News newsletter
Medical News

   EMAIL   |   PRINT

Woman's complain against hospital dismissed


Jun 17, 2013 - 10:19:33 AM

 

New Delhi, June 17 - A woman who filed a negligence complaint against St. Stephen's Hospital here for a botched up sterilisation has been shown the door by the top consumer court, saying that she deliberately did not abort the unwanted pregnancy and moved a consumer forum for compensation as a girl was born to her.

The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission slammed complainant Shalini, a resident of north Delhi's Alipur, and reversed a state consumer commission judgment in her favour.

Sterilization is not 100 percent safe and secure and after getting knowledge of conception in spite of having undergone the sterilization operation, if the couple opts for bearing the child, it ceases to be an unwanted child and compensation for maintenance and upbringing of such a child cannot be claimed, the national commission said in a recent judgment.

The commission's Presiding Member K.S. Chaudhari and Member B.C. Gupta said: After confirmation of pregnancy, Shalini should have filed a complaint immediately, but she waited till delivery and it appears that as female child was delivered, she filed the complaint, which is not fair on her part.

The commission offered relief to the hospital and dismissed the state consumer commission's decision which held the institution and one of its doctors guilty of negligence resulting in Shalini conceiving despite undergoing an abdominal tubectomy operation Jan 28, 1998.

Chaudhari said after the sterilization operation, when Shalini noticed her pregnancy in September-October 2000, she could have terminated it if she was not willing to bear the child, as this was legal and permissible under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971.

Since she opted for bearing the child, she could not seek compensation for bringing up the child and expenses to be incurred on her marriage, the apex consumer commission said.

We are of the view that the district forum has committed an error in allowing - complaint and granting compensation and the state commission further committed error in dismissing the appeal, the national commission said, allowing the hospital's revision petition against the state commission's decision Jan 21, 2008.

The national commission dismissed allegations of medical negligence against the hospital and noted that at the time of conducting the sterlization procedure, it was clearly mentioned by doctors that the operation may be unsuccessful and her husband should go for vasectomy. But he did not do so.

Shalini, in her complaint before the district forum claimed that despite undergoing the tubectomy, she became pregnant and gave birth to a child July 27, 2001.

Alleging medical deficiency in the sterilization operation by the St. Stephen's Hospital, she claimed Rs.25,000 towards general expenses for the delivery and Rs.4 lakh for bringing up the unwanted child, her residence, medical attendance, treatment, day-to-day general expenses and her marriage.

The hospital and its doctor contested the complaint and submitted that sterilization was performed with utmost skill, care and caution. They explained that there was a patient-specific problem in achieving a successful procedure and this was conveyed to her.

The district forum, after hearing both the parties, allowed Shalini's complaint and awarded Rs.1 lakh as compensation and Rs.2,000 as cost of litigation to her. An appeal filed by the hospital against the district forum decision was dismissed by the state consumer commission.

The national commission has now reversed the findings of the state commission, given a clean chit to the hospital and quashed the direction to pay compensation to Shalini.

-


Subscribe to Medical News Newsletter

Enter your email address:


 Feedback
For any corrections of factual information, to contact the editors or to send any medical news or health news press releases, use feedback form

Top of Page

 
Contact us

RxPG Online

Nerve

Online ACLS Certification

 

    Full Text RSS

© All rights reserved by RxPG Medical Solutions Private Limited (India)