RxPG News Feed for RxPG News

Medical Research Health Special Topics World
  Home
 
   Health
 Aging
 Asian Health
 Events
 Fitness
 Food & Nutrition
 Happiness
 Men's Health
 Mental Health
 Occupational Health
 Parenting
 Public Health
 Sleep Hygiene
 Women's Health
 
   Healthcare
 Africa
 Australia
 Canada Healthcare
 China Healthcare
 India Healthcare
 New Zealand
 South Africa
 UK
  NHS
 USA
 World Healthcare
 
   Latest Research
 Aging
 Alternative Medicine
 Anaethesia
 Biochemistry
 Biotechnology
 Cancer
 Cardiology
 Clinical Trials
 Cytology
 Dental
 Dermatology
 Embryology
 Endocrinology
 ENT
 Environment
 Epidemiology
 Gastroenterology
 Genetics
 Gynaecology
 Haematology
 Immunology
 Infectious Diseases
 Medicine
 Metabolism
 Microbiology
 Musculoskeletal
 Nephrology
 Neurosciences
 Obstetrics
 Ophthalmology
 Orthopedics
 Paediatrics
 Pathology
 Pharmacology
 Physiology
 Physiotherapy
 Psychiatry
 Radiology
 Rheumatology
 Sports Medicine
 Surgery
 Toxicology
 Urology
 
   Medical News
 Awards & Prizes
 Epidemics
 Launch
 Opinion
 Professionals
 
   Special Topics
 Ethics
 Euthanasia
 Evolution
 Feature
 Odd Medical News
 Climate

Last Updated: Oct 11, 2012 - 10:22:56 PM
British Medical Journal NHS Channel

subscribe to NHS newsletter
Healthcare : UK : NHS

   EMAIL   |   PRINT
Should EU patient information laws be relaxed?

Mar 30, 2007 - 2:07:46 AM , Reviewed by: Dr. Rashmi Yadav
"Relevant, comparative and appropriate information on health issues cannot be provided by drug companies.”

 
[RxPG] In 2002 the European parliament voted resoundingly against allowing drug companies to provide information about their products directly to patients. However, five years on, this decision is set to be challenged again.

A special report in this week’s BMJ looks at the arguments.

Hard lobbying by the drug industry has convinced EU health commissioners that increasing the extent to which drug companies can provide information to patients is essential to stop Europe’s drug industry falling further behind those of the United States and Japan. Drug companies also assert that this change would benefit patients.

But health campaign groups insist that drug companies cannot provide the independent information consumers need.

The commission will set out its final position next month, but speculation is already rife that it is likely to suggest changes to legislation that would jeopardise the current ban on direct to consumer advertising for prescription drugs.

Campaigners are particularly concerned that if the commission decides it needs to relax the laws then direct to consumer advertising would be introduced almost as a side effect.

Despite assurances that blatant advertising is not the intention, Barbara Mintzes of the University of British Columbia disagrees, saying that any change in the law to allow industry to provide information could produce undesirable effects – even if the advertising ban remains in place.

Rita Kessler of the campaign group AIM agrees. She believes that the current proposals would result in poor quality information and questions the need for more health information. She suggests that the commission should instead endorse an EU logo mark that would be awarded to high quality information sources and act as a quality stamp to help patients identify reliable, evidence based advice.

In anticipation of the commission’s final report in April, five international health associations have joined forces to step up their opposition campaign. They assert that “relevant, comparative and appropriate information on health issues cannot be provided by drug companies,” because in a competitive marketplace, dug companies must present their own products in a more favourable light than other preventive or therapeutic options.

However, the quick turnaround of MEPs means that few of the original objectors from 2002 remain in office – and that could mean a completely different outcome when patient information laws are debated again.




Publication: British Medical Journal
On the web: http://www.bmj.com/ 

Advertise in this space for $10 per month. Contact us today.


Related NHS News
Systematic bias in the assessment of UK doctors
Depression is wrongly seen as natural part of getting older
NRI doctor guilty of unethical tests on British patients
New steps to curb overseas doctors in Britain
Should EU patient information laws be relaxed?
Institutional discrimination by NHS causing unnecessary deaths of people with a learning disability
Should the NHS curb spending on translation services?
The NHS Redress Act may lead to more complaints
Patients should cc the benefits of doctors' letters
Is doctors' pay responsible for the financial crisis in the NHS ?

Subscribe to NHS Newsletter

Enter your email address:


 About Dr. Rashmi Yadav
This news story has been reviewed by Dr. Rashmi Yadav before its publication on RxPG News website. Dr. Rashmi Yadav, MBBS, is a senior editor for RxPG News. In her position she is responsible for managing special correspondents and the surgery section of the website. Her areas of special interest include cardiothoracic surgery and interventional radiology.
RxPG News is committed to promotion and implementation of Evidence Based Medical Journalism in all channels of mass media including internet.
 Feedback
For any corrections of factual information, to contact the editors or to send any medical news or health news press releases, use feedback form

Top of Page

 
Contact us

RxPG Online

Nerve

 

    Full Text RSS

© All rights reserved by RxPG Medical Solutions Private Limited (India)