XML Feed for RxPG News   Add RxPG News Headlines to My Yahoo!   Javascript Syndication for RxPG News

Research Health World General
 
  Home
 
   Health
 Aging
 Asian Health
 Events
 Fitness
 Food & Nutrition
 Happiness
 Men's Health
 Mental Health
 Occupational Health
 Parenting
 Public Health
 Sleep Hygiene
 Women's Health
 
   Healthcare
 Africa
 Australia
 Canada Healthcare
 China Healthcare
 India Healthcare
 New Zealand
 South Africa
 UK
 USA
 World Healthcare
 
   Latest Research
 Aging
 Alternative Medicine
 Anaethesia
 Biochemistry
 Biotechnology
 Cancer
 Cardiology
 Clinical Trials
 Cytology
 Dental
 Dermatology
 Embryology
 Endocrinology
 ENT
 Environment
 Epidemiology
 Gastroenterology
 Genetics
 Gynaecology
 Haematology
 Immunology
 Infectious Diseases
 Medicine
 Metabolism
 Microbiology
 Musculoskeletal
 Nephrology
 Neurosciences
  Brain Diseases
  Demyelinating Diseases
  Headache
  Memory
  Neurochemistry
  Neurodegenerative Diseases
  Regeneration
  Spinal Cord Diseases
  Stroke
  Taste
  Trigeminal Neuralgia
 Obstetrics
 Ophthalmology
 Orthopedics
 Paediatrics
 Pathology
 Pharmacology
 Physiology
 Physiotherapy
 Psychiatry
 Radiology
 Rheumatology
 Sports Medicine
 Surgery
 Toxicology
 Urology
 
   Medical News
 Awards & Prizes
 Epidemics
 Launch
 Opinion
 Professionals
 
   Special Topics
 Ethics
 Euthanasia
 Evolution
 Feature
 Odd Medical News
 Climate
Search

Last Updated: Nov 18, 2006 - 1:55:25 PM

Taste Channel
subscribe to Taste newsletter

Latest Research : Neurosciences : Taste

   DISCUSS   |   EMAIL   |   PRINT
Creating Sugar Substitutes by Understanding How People Percieve Taste
Mar 29, 2006 - 6:22:00 AM, Reviewed by: Dr. Priya Saxena

“So many sugar substitutes also have unpleasant tastes,”

 
The most important factor in what kind of sweetener people prefer has little to do with how sweet it tastes. Rather, it has more to do with other tastes in the sweetener, such as bitterness or sourness, new research suggests.

Food scientists at Ohio State University asked 30 college students to rate 13 different sweeteners and sweet substances, including sugar, based on how much bitter, sour and metallic tastes they perceived with each substance. Many of these compounds are found in items such as diet soda, gum, candy and Jell-O, and some can be used for baking.

Not surprisingly, sugar was rated highest. Participants found sucralose (brand name Splenda), a sweetener derived from sugar, the most acceptable alternative to sugar. The researchers attribute this to a lack of noticeable sour and bitter tastes in this sweetener.

“So many sugar substitutes also have unpleasant tastes,” said Jeannine Delwiche, a study co-author and an assistant professor of food science and technology at Ohio State University. “Understanding how people perceive these tastes may help create a sugar substitute that is more palatable. That ultimately means making tastier products with fewer calories.”

“Sugar is the gold standard for companies that make artificial sweeteners,” said Delwiche, who also directs Ohio State's Sensory Science Group. “But it's packed with calories. Most of these other substances have few to no calories.”

Delwiche and study co-author Amanda Warnock, a former graduate student in food science at Ohio State, presented their findings March 28 in Atlanta at the annual meeting of the American Chemical Society.

The researchers asked the 30 panelists to rate the sweet, bitter, sour and metallic tastes that accompanied the 13 sweeteners and sweet substances. Each participant rinsed his or her mouth out thoroughly with water between tasting small samples of each compound. Most of the substances sampled in this study are already used by the food industry.

A few of the sweet substances listed aren't typically used by the food industry as sweeteners. However, the researchers wanted to know how the panelists reacted to a variety of sweet substances; in the future this information may lead to better-tasting sweeteners. (See the side bar for a complete list of the sweeteners and sweet substances used in this study.)

In the first of three sessions, participants rated their overall liking and acceptance of the sweet compounds. In the second and third sessions, each panelist rated the sweet, sour, bitter and metallic intensities of each sample.

The results showed that the sweeteners that the participants liked best had no, or next to no, sour, bitter or metallic tastes.

Next to sugar and sucralose, the panelists liked xylitol best. Xylitol is used primarily in chewing gum. Aspartame (sold under the brand names Equal and Nutra Sweet) and fructose were also highly rated. The panelists liked stevia, saccharin, D-tryptophan and glycine the least.

“Most of these last four substances have pronounced bitter, sour or metallic tastes,” Delwiche said.

The rest of the substances – thaumatin, cyclamate, acesulfame potassium and glucose – were ranked in between the most-preferred and the least-liked compounds.

Delwiche plans to continue this work and include larger groups of participants to figure out what drives individual differences in taste perception.

“There is a need for much more research to fully understand how people perceive sweet tastes,” she said.
 

- Ohio State University
 

www.osu.edu

 
Subscribe to Taste Newsletter
E-mail Address:

 

This project was self-funded; the researchers received no financial support for this work from any of the sweetener manufacturers.

Related Taste News
Signs of aging may be linked to undetected blocked brain blood vessels
Insects evolved radically different strategy to smell
In fruit flies, homosexuality is biological but not hard-wired
Pheromones identified that trigger aggression between male mice
Smell experience during critical period alters brain
Sweet smell
Genetic variant linked to odor perception
Flies prefer fizzy drinks
Researchers find new taste in fruit flies: carbonated water
Mice use specialized neurons to detect carbon dioxide in the air


For any corrections of factual information, to contact the editors or to send any medical news or health news press releases, use feedback form

Top of Page

 

© Copyright 2004 onwards by RxPG Medical Solutions Private Limited
Contact Us