RxPG News Feed for RxPG News

Medical Research Health Special Topics World
  Home
 
   Health
 Aging
 Asian Health
 Events
 Fitness
 Food & Nutrition
 Happiness
 Men's Health
 Mental Health
 Occupational Health
 Parenting
 Public Health
 Sleep Hygiene
 Women's Health
 
   Healthcare
 Africa
 Australia
 Canada Healthcare
 China Healthcare
 India Healthcare
 New Zealand
 South Africa
 UK
 USA
 World Healthcare
 
   Latest Research
 Aging
 Alternative Medicine
 Anaethesia
 Biochemistry
 Biotechnology
 Cancer
 Cardiology
 Clinical Trials
 Cytology
 Dental
 Dermatology
 Embryology
 Endocrinology
 ENT
 Environment
 Epidemiology
 Gastroenterology
 Genetics
 Gynaecology
 Haematology
 Immunology
 Infectious Diseases
 Medicine
 Metabolism
 Microbiology
 Musculoskeletal
 Nephrology
 Neurosciences
  Brain Diseases
  Demyelinating Diseases
  Headache
  Memory
  Neurochemistry
  Neurodegenerative Diseases
  Regeneration
  Spinal Cord Diseases
  Stroke
  Taste
  Trigeminal Neuralgia
 Obstetrics
 Ophthalmology
 Orthopedics
 Paediatrics
 Pathology
 Pharmacology
 Physiology
 Physiotherapy
 Psychiatry
 Radiology
 Rheumatology
 Sports Medicine
 Surgery
 Toxicology
 Urology
 
   Medical News
 Awards & Prizes
 Epidemics
 Launch
 Opinion
 Professionals
 
   Special Topics
 Ethics
 Euthanasia
 Evolution
 Feature
 Odd Medical News
 Climate

Last Updated: Oct 11, 2012 - 10:22:56 PM
Neurosciences Channel

subscribe to Neurosciences newsletter
Latest Research : Neurosciences

   EMAIL   |   PRINT
Tuning in to How Neurons Distinguish between Stimuli

Mar 22, 2006 - 12:05:00 PM , Reviewed by: Priya Saxena
The analysis reveals that this noise in the neurons’ response is crucial to figuring out when neurons are most discriminating.

 
[RxPG] Most anyone can tell grape juice from fine wine with a quick sip, but distinguishing a French Syrah from an Australian Shiraz requires a more refined palette, plus perhaps a bout of sniffing and swirling. Similarly, our sensory neurons’ ability to make distinctions depends on the task at hand: in some cases, they excel at making coarse distinctions; in others, they are better at hairsplitting.

Finding out what exactly particular neurons are responding to is not as easy as asking a fellow diner which wine they prefer. But using a mathematical measure of information, a new study by Daniel Butts of Harvard University and Mark Goldman of Wellesley College reveals when specific cells are best at discriminating among different stimuli.

Listening in on neuronal activity, neuroscientists can see that a field of vertical stripes flashed in front of a cat’s eyes, for example, will goad a certain set of neurons into firing frenetically. Similarly, horizontal stripes will set another set of neurons firing, and diagonal stripes will activate all these neurons at some intermediate level.

So tweaking the stimuli—say, rotating the stripes—shows how a particular neuron or set of neurons responds to various stimuli, and the set of results can be represented with a so-called tuning curve. These curves are typically bell-shaped with a peak around one point where neurons are firing most quickly—corresponding, say, to stripes held vertically—and drop off to low activity on either side.

However, it hasn’t been clear which part of the tuning curve is most significant: does the peak reflect the stimuli a neuron is best at detecting? Or are the steep slopes of the curve most important, since this is where a small change in the stimulus elicits the greatest change in the neuron’s response? Studies of actual and simulated neuronal activity have given mixed results, without an overarching theory to explain them all.

In the new study, Butts and Goldman applied a mathematical measure of information, which they call the stimulus-specific information (SSI), to neurons’ tuning curves. If a neuron has a very reliable response to a certain stimulus, it is straightforward to spot this response. But if the neuron fires more sporadically, it is harder to say for sure if the neuron is responding to that stimulus or not. By calculating the SSI for neurons’ responses, Butts and Goldman were able to quantify how this uncertainty affected the ability of a neuron to convey information about various stimuli.
Tuning in to How Neurons Distinguish between Stimuli
This �Batman� graph shows which stimuli are best encoded by a neuron in a relatively noise-free situation, when the neuron is better at making fine distinctions.

The analysis reveals that this noise in the neurons’ response is crucial to figuring out when neurons are most discriminating. In general, when the neurons’ responses were less noisy, the neurons were best at fine discrimination. In this case, a graph of the SSI could resemble a silhouette of Batman’s head: two sharp peaks, corresponding to the slopes of the tuning curve, with a smaller bump in the middle, matching the tuning curve’s peak. When the neurons’ response was noisy, however, the neurons were making more coarse distinction, and the graph of the SSI mirrored the tuning curve, showing a single peak where the neuron was firing most rapidly.

With their measure of SSI, Butts and Goldman have shown a way to connect neurons’ responses with how they process information and signal their neighbors. So just because a neuron is firing lackadaisically, that doesn’t mean it’s not getting the job done.



Publication: Inman M (2006) Tuning in to How Neurons Distinguish between Stimuli. PLoS Biol 4(4): e118
On the web: Read Research Article 

Advertise in this space for $10 per month. Contact us today.


Related Neurosciences News
A new tool for brain research
Eve Marder to receive the $500,000 Gruber Neuroscience Prize
Research teams find genetic variant that could improve warfarin dosing in African-Americans
Diagnostic coronary angiography: Functional flow reserve changes decisions in 25 percent of cases
Study identifies a genetic risk factor for persistent pain
New BRAIN initiative announced at White House
Nurses can play key role in reducing deaths from world's most common diseases
UH Case Medical Center awarded highest certification as Comprehensive Stroke Center
NIH funds research to identify Parkinson's biomarkers
Treatment with clot-busting drug yields better results after stroke than supportive therapy alone

Subscribe to Neurosciences Newsletter

Enter your email address:


 Additional information about the news article
Tuning in to How Neurons Distinguish between Stimuli

Mason Inman

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040118

Published: March 21, 2006

Copyright: © 2006 Public Library of Science. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
 Feedback
For any corrections of factual information, to contact the editors or to send any medical news or health news press releases, use feedback form

Top of Page

 
Contact us

RxPG Online

Nerve

 

    Full Text RSS

© All rights reserved by RxPG Medical Solutions Private Limited (India)